|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
8 Apr 2009, 04:15 (Ref:2436383) | #176 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Personally i loved to see a six class series. P1, P2, P3, GT1, GT2, GT3. (but only if all the P cars were actual two seaters).
|
||
|
8 Apr 2009, 09:22 (Ref:2436525) | #177 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Thats a crap idea . P3 & GT3 should be national championships or feeder series .
Why not have a P3 & GT3 support race instead then . |
||
|
8 Apr 2009, 09:26 (Ref:2436534) | #178 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,487
|
|||
|
8 Apr 2009, 11:12 (Ref:2436608) | #179 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Oh ok ..... in my opinion GT3 and LMP3 does not have any place on ALMS grid . What do you tell them when the economy is on the up again ? Sorry but we dont need you any more !!! .....
If your championship is run to ACO rules , then run it to ACO rules . The ALMS grid is a little on the small side but ..... its still a decent championship . |
||
|
8 Apr 2009, 13:28 (Ref:2436706) | #180 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
But it never really has run strictly to ACO rules has it? |
|||
|
8 Apr 2009, 16:48 (Ref:2436834) | #181 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,354
|
Quote:
As long as it is clear that it is a temporary invitation class to bolster numbers - I dont see the problem. I am sure if the LMS was in a similar crisis then they would do the same thing. |
|||
|
8 Apr 2009, 18:09 (Ref:2436881) | #182 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,623
|
The De fErran Acura did not win the green challenge. It did not finish the race. The Panoz did not win the Green challenge. Come on guys. It's a Thumping! Elan! Ford! V8. BMw has been known to be the best at fuel mileage in evey motosport series they do. In Grand-Am BMW was the best at fuel mileage 3 years ago when the Make A Wish Riley with Finlay and McDowell ran. In Formula 1 BMW managed to always qualify lighter than the rest. Yet go about the same distance. They probably have a 1 or lap advantage over the competition.
THe GT2 has two extra amenities in it's car compared to the rest of the GT2's. They mentioned it at Sebring. Anybody remember |
|
|
8 Apr 2009, 18:33 (Ref:2436895) | #183 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
The priority is more cars on the grid, GT3 is an internationally recognised class, LMP3 is not.
Once new teams have the ALMS bug, then you can look at easing them into the 'ACO' classes. You may even find P2 becomes a decent budget option once GT2 engines are in use. |
|
|
8 Apr 2009, 18:41 (Ref:2436899) | #184 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 573
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
8 Apr 2009, 20:34 (Ref:2436966) | #185 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,334
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
8 Apr 2009, 21:02 (Ref:2436987) | #186 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
|
Quote:
What we have is not so much a chronically low absolute car count as a chronically low car count in 3 of the 4 classes. The total number of cars on track is, of course, still an issue, but what's really at stake is whether there is sufficient depth on offer to provide a good show in each class. GT2 is the one to watch right now because there is a good scrap between many competitive cars, but while we have 6 protos, they are no longer able to compete on level terms and thus we have no prototype battle. Adding in another GT class with a paltry number of cars (say 6) and another P class with an equal number does very little for the series unless those cars are very very well matched with each other, and even in that eventuality do nothing to mitigate the boredom of 2 Acuras tromping on Intersport in P1. The only thing you get is a yet more confusing, fractionated field with a bunch of bland battles and, of course, GT2. Is it really making things better, or is it just providing even less impetus to bolster numbers in the classes that really need them? We'll always have 2008, friends... |
|||
|
8 Apr 2009, 22:34 (Ref:2437033) | #187 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
|
We are deep into one of the worst financial crisis in history. We (sports car fans) still have series which are struggling along, like all other business. St Pete was always going to battle to get a good grid. There is light at the end of the tunnel with more possible starters later this year throughout the field.
|
||
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson |
9 Apr 2009, 00:20 (Ref:2437067) | #188 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 94
|
I think cmk nailed it. The only thing I can do about this is sacrifice and go to more races. So I think I will add Miller and RA to Sebring and PLM. Maybe find someone to share gas money.
|
|
|
9 Apr 2009, 02:08 (Ref:2437087) | #189 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Quote:
Quote:
And if you're so worried about hurting their feelings when things improve, then they'd have to have separate races just like IMSA used to do when there were too many cars in one class for the smaller tracks to handle. |
||||
|
9 Apr 2009, 02:12 (Ref:2437089) | #190 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,154
|
Quote:
Agree totally that increase in car numbers in present classes is what really needs to happen. You can cross off GT1, so that is really focused on P1 and P2. So, how do you do it? My questions about viablity of something like adding P3 is just as a field filler, and of course also has the necessity of some of those cars actually entering....are there actually any here in states? The other option is to look at a heavily subscribed LMES series and see if you can entice some of those competitors to decamp across the ocean and do the balance of the season here. I would think that would require some healthy support ($$$). The likely level you pull over is the field filler level anyway, isn't it? Low car count not so bad at St. Pete's short track. Field is going to look lost in Utah and some other places this year. I think crowd would be happy with some GT3 cars in the race, but I think those need to be the myrid of makes that you see in European races, and not just Porsches. It is stop gap, sure, but, it adds to the show. Crowds likely to be happier with a mixed group on GT3 cars then a mixed bag of P cars I would think, and an Audi R8 or two would help to keep that group's fans happy. Of course, opening the door for those doesn't mean we would see them, since we are talking some fairly expensive equipment there too. |
|||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
9 Apr 2009, 16:52 (Ref:2437549) | #191 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
I wouldn't allow LMP3, you may end up with glorified club cars, but GT3 is an established class with recognisable, quick cars, and returns the ALMS to a two class GT structure. P1 can only be sorted if Audi, Porsche or whoever step up next season. P2 must be on the agenda for both potential entrants and those looking to step up from GT2, but again only for 2010 and beyond. Manufacturer's are withdrawing and the class will use more cost effective GT2/Production engines |
||
|
9 Apr 2009, 16:56 (Ref:2437556) | #192 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
9 Apr 2009, 19:15 (Ref:2437650) | #193 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,299
|
|||
|
9 Apr 2009, 23:11 (Ref:2437782) | #194 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
Isn't the AsLMS (we really need to find a proper acronym) all ACO?
|
|
|
17 Apr 2009, 08:12 (Ref:2442818) | #195 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,102
|
Erm..........surely time to unstick this thread and sticky the thread for this weekend's ALMS race.
|
|
|
17 Apr 2009, 13:00 (Ref:2443036) | #196 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Huge, how many of those various 16 classes at Sebring were reliably in overall competition with one another though? Power-to-weight and other measures were much more widely in use back then. I believe it was Le Mans 1967 where Jochen Rindt was VERY close to the pace of the Ford GT40 MkIVs (7.0-litre) in a Porsche 907 (2.0-litre). So that put what, four prototype classes in close proximity with the 2, 3, 5, and 7-litre cars. We just don't have classes arrayed like that anymore. There's also the issue of sheer volume of entries. Le Mans at one time accommodated up to 60 cars, while Daytona and Sebring would have fields of 70-80+ cars. Five to ten classes look a lot fuller when you have those cars distributed in a field of that size, rather than one that's merely half the size.
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
17 Apr 2009, 18:46 (Ref:2443226) | #197 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
|||
|
23 Apr 2009, 08:25 (Ref:2447616) | #198 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 296
|
Can only agree with the sentiment here that focusing on P1 and P2 car counts (for the ALMS, anyway) is much more important than adding a bunch of beetle cup cars to boost the overall car count.
|
|
|
23 Apr 2009, 17:25 (Ref:2448005) | #199 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5,892
|
Bob, that depended on the track, and even then, not always as much as you might think. A Lola T70 or Ford GT40 was around a ton, whereas a 2.0-litre Porsche was down around 1400lb. And in the late '60s, the 3.0-litre Porsches were pushing down to 1100-1200lb. Like I said, Jochen Rindt was harrying the 7.0-litre Fords in 1967 with a 2.0-litre Porsche 907. i believe it was a Ferrari 250P (3.0-litre prototype) that won Le Mans outright in 1965, against cars with much larger capacity engines.
|
||
__________________
The only certainty is that nothing is certain. |
23 Apr 2009, 17:38 (Ref:2448015) | #200 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
|
Quote:
Car were classified by displacement; did power to weight have an effect, but of course. The ford GTs were NOT light. One reason to go to a bigger engine. They gained more weight but in the balance gained a large enough chunk of power to off-set the weight gain. If one thought one could get a better over-all performance balance with a smaller class/car, they would go for it. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
'09 ALMS Round One Sebring Mar.18-21 | HORNDAWG | North American Racing | 1052 | 3 Apr 2009 17:11 |
ALMS Round 3: Long Beach, April 18-20, 2008 | dxk1 | North American Racing | 159 | 24 Apr 2008 15:16 |
ALMS Round 2: St. Petersburg, April 4-5, 2008 (Spoilers) | dxk1 | North American Racing | 185 | 9 Apr 2008 02:53 |
ALMS Rnd 2: St.Pete 29-31 Mar 2007 | HORNDAWG | North American Racing | 315 | 5 Apr 2007 04:47 |
St. Pete May be Gone | Tim Northcutt | ChampCar World Series | 17 | 3 Sep 2004 17:30 |