|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 Apr 2014, 19:17 (Ref:3394063) | #6576 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 318
|
||
|
17 Apr 2014, 19:30 (Ref:3394068) | #6577 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
We all hate to see race cars made slower. Thing is, there probably isn't a lot more to be had from the P2 engines, and probably not a lot of weight which could be stripped off.
Let us all remember that P2s were Considerably faster than DPs before DPs were cranked up (at huge expense.) Trying to now boost the P2s would only cost even more money and it would be to compensate for overdoing the DPs. Backing off the DP power by 50 bhp wouldn't make them a Lot slower---and it would still leave them about 100 bhp over where they were in Rolex. It is by far the cheapest and simplest solution. And it would still leave DPs monumentally faster than they were last year. All of this goes back to TUSC management not being willing to line up a P2 and DP for serious side-by-side testing back last summer or fall. That's the part that really rankles. if TUSC had taken this series as seriously as the fans and teams do, all the BoP adjustments could have been right from the start, and we wouldn't be having this four-month debate. Oh, well. |
|
|
17 Apr 2014, 19:40 (Ref:3394073) | #6578 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
If I´m not wrong recently the only US LMP teams who made Le Mans were Highcroft, Level 5 and Starworks. None of them contest the WEC or have been at Le Mans consistently.
Maybe the question is if it is worth to keep the P2s in TUSCC for a what if scenario. I´m not a big DP fan, but maybe is the time to ditch the P2 at TUSCC. |
||
|
17 Apr 2014, 20:19 (Ref:3394088) | #6579 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,608
|
Quote:
We need the revised P2 regulations from the ACO, or freeze the existing ones, as soon as possible. TUSCC needs to move towards the ELMS model as quickly as possible. |
|||
|
17 Apr 2014, 21:23 (Ref:3394111) | #6580 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 690
|
Quote:
They have all the big events now. Daytona, Sebring, Petit. And the best GT battle in the world. Its only been 3 races, and there has been changes from top to bottom along the way |
||
|
17 Apr 2014, 21:43 (Ref:3394114) | #6581 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
|||
|
17 Apr 2014, 21:47 (Ref:3394116) | #6582 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 554
|
It’s hard to blame IMSA for the loss of Level 5. Rumors abound of Tucker pricing himself out of rental drivers. The loss of his brother (for which I have sympathy) or his legal problems (for which I have NONE) are more likely reasons.
I also have little sympathy for Pickett. Whatever the truth to rumors of other deals he was working on; the fact is they never turned a P2 lap until the ROAR. They still managed to qualify fastest and finish best of the P2s at Daytona, and qualified at Sebring between the ESM cars. Except for invitational races (Sebring/Petit), the last few years taking the green would get them a podium. That hasn’t happened, so they quit. C-ya bye. In the shaky years of IMSA (post Bishop, pre doc Panoz), there were some LM class “invitational” entries at Daytona. In 1991 3 LM R90CKs were entered by Nissan Performance Technology, aka Electromotive, the US “factory” team. Driven by known and/or popular drivers, they finished 2nd (-18 laps), 20th, and 44th. It backfired on IMSA the next year. An LM class R91CP entered by Nissan Motorsports International, the real factory team, ran away and hid. I mean that literally, because they parked the car in the garage for 3 hours. They replaced damaged bodywork, washed the car, and brought it back out for the final 20 minutes to circulate laps and take the checker. The official margin was 9 laps and the distance was not matched for 20 years. In those days of qualifying tires and adjustable boost, it was normal to see cars qualify many seconds faster than they ran in the race. This car ran race laps within 2 seconds of their qualifying time so there were strong suspicions of sandbagging. It was an extremely unpopular win. Everybody knew the car was not IMSA legal and was ineligible for points. There were more people booing than there were waving on the cooldown lap. I would bet Nascar remembers that race. The success or failure of WEC P2 may have a bearing on 2017 IMSA rules but, unless factories offer (and teams buy) customer cars; I wouldn’t look for P1s at an IMSA event for a long time. |
||
__________________
“You know you’re in trouble when the first person to get to you after a wreck is carrying a beer” -Jimmy Horton, Talladega 7/25/93 |
17 Apr 2014, 21:54 (Ref:3394122) | #6583 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 932
|
Going by the timing data at Long Beach, Oak was less than 4mph down at start/finish to the fastest DPs, losing about 0.3-0.4s down the front straight, and were then about equal or making up 0.1s on the rest of the circuit, or theresabouts. ESM was apparently killing it through turns 9&10 and faster than Oak there, but losing a tenth to them on the front straight. Oak's strongest sector was around the fountain. Oddly, the Taylor DP was tremendous from pit-out to turn 1. They were only up ~1mph to Oak at S/F, and also fast for a DP in 9&10, so I'm going to assume they had the downforce piled on.
Last edited by Danske; 17 Apr 2014 at 22:00. |
|
|
17 Apr 2014, 22:21 (Ref:3394134) | #6584 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 797
|
I think the two classes are closer in raw lap time than they are in raceability. The real issue with the DPs is just grunt, shows up numerically as top speed but is really acceleration off a corner or recovery from a balk or lift in traffic. I suspect 50hp would prove too much of a laptime hit, 25 might get closer but they will always be hard for a P2 to pass and stay past if DPs are capable of near the same lap times. A lot of green running would be an equalizer too but not quite enough under the current BOP and as yet I have little faith that it will be a regular occurrence.
|
||
|
17 Apr 2014, 23:21 (Ref:3394150) | #6585 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,126
|
2008, the year the bottom dropped out of the international markets. The pinnacle of the ALMS...
http://www.lasersol.com/CyberMotor/p...2008_tues.html |
|
|
17 Apr 2014, 23:43 (Ref:3394151) | #6586 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 338
|
I'm guessing that Pickett/Graf/Luhr did not want to chase around DP's and end up with 5th place finishes. Given what they have ALL achieved, why write a chapter of mediocrity to go along with it?
|
||
|
18 Apr 2014, 00:04 (Ref:3394154) | #6587 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
18 Apr 2014, 01:16 (Ref:3394166) | #6588 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,126
|
No, don't decrease the HP of the DP's, just decrease their fuel cell size by 25%.
That way, fans still get to see the power of the DP's and get to see how teams strategize to get the most out of their fuel allocation. |
|
|
18 Apr 2014, 03:15 (Ref:3394190) | #6589 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
That would work, but will those DP teams, especially Gannasi, agree to reduce their fuel allocation? That's up to the IMSA to convince them which will not happen right away.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2014, 03:37 (Ref:3394191) | #6590 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
So when the race director throws a full course debris caution with 20 mins to go and the race goes green with 5 mins left that fuel strategy will make up for the DPs extra HP right....yeah makes total sense.. Series is screwed, Im sorry, I really havent paid as much attention as I did before. Mediocre mess of cars ruining the GTLM class and Prototypes while accepted throughout the world are absolutely BONED in the US. |
|||
__________________
R.I.P. ALMS 1999 - 2013 Michigan Football & Basketball, Oregon Football, Detroit Tigers |
18 Apr 2014, 08:50 (Ref:3394271) | #6591 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,405
|
Something tucked away in John Dagys' Thursday notes from the Silverstone WEC round:
"At least one current TUDOR United SportsCar Championship team is evaluating the possibility of a switch to the FIA WEC for next year." http://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/s...sday-notebook/ |
|
|
18 Apr 2014, 12:30 (Ref:3394397) | #6592 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
18 Apr 2014, 13:17 (Ref:3394417) | #6593 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 160
|
If Pickett goes to the WEC, will he run in P1 or P2? I'd like to see P1 since they did so well against the best of the best in the ALMS for P1.
|
|
|
18 Apr 2014, 13:21 (Ref:3394421) | #6594 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 797
|
|||
|
18 Apr 2014, 13:31 (Ref:3394432) | #6595 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,126
|
Quote:
Good to see growth in sportscars somewhere. Wish it was here. |
||
|
18 Apr 2014, 13:37 (Ref:3394433) | #6596 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 953
|
I don't know whether that's the expansion of the series or just them being more lax about giving accreditation out...
They've even given me one. |
||
|
18 Apr 2014, 15:19 (Ref:3394483) | #6597 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 554
|
Quote:
Quote:
“Hey Vern, it’s like bobbing for water. You can’t lose!” ---Jim Varney, aka Ernest P. Worrell 1949-2000 “We came in second. You came in next to last.” ---Soviet commentary on the race to the moon |
||||
__________________
“You know you’re in trouble when the first person to get to you after a wreck is carrying a beer” -Jimmy Horton, Talladega 7/25/93 |
18 Apr 2014, 15:38 (Ref:3394501) | #6598 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
Enzo Potolicchio tells Shaw and Hindy that TUSC knows it has a BoP problem and is planning to make changes?
Could be good news. If TUSC makes changes, we could see the 8Star Ligier full-time in TUSC--and maybe more P2s. |
|
|
18 Apr 2014, 16:03 (Ref:3394513) | #6599 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,608
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
18 Apr 2014, 16:31 (Ref:3394524) | #6600 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
Quote:
MMPR is by no means a bad team, but they are up against Ganassi, - and I am not even a fan of the Chipster or Pruett - but that's an organisation every bit as good as Penske or Joest. Pickett accepted not being able to beat Joest under anything but the very best of circumstances, why should he then expect anything different against Ganassi? Last edited by Speed-King; 18 Apr 2014 at 16:36. |
|||
__________________
Ceterum censeo GTE-Am esse delendam. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Series to face axe | AndyF | National & Club Racing | 8 | 6 Aug 2001 11:54 |
Will the BTCC get the axe? | Sodemo2 | Touring Car Racing | 8 | 6 Mar 2001 13:58 |