|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
24 May 2004, 00:43 (Ref:980617) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Stephenw, I'm as big a Schumacher and Ferrari fan as anyone here, but I really can't blame JPM for this incident. Michael overdid it trying to get some heat into brakes & tyres, which was a bit dim of him in the tunnel (nice pun eh? dim ), JPM was a bit close - knowing that the safety car was going in - and got caught out. JPM took evasive action, but Michael was already sliding and there just wasn't room.
I think Mr V is merely suggesting that having a pop at JPM might be a favourite pastime of yours? |
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
24 May 2004, 01:10 (Ref:980633) | #27 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 404
|
not haven driven at Monaco (although I have sat on the grid... see attached pic!!!) I have no idea what the normal restart procedure is... is it normal to warm the brakes in the tunnel? (maybe they normally blast though to clear the cobwebs out!) If yes, JPM is a knob, otherwise TGF is That's my analysis.
|
||
|
24 May 2004, 01:18 (Ref:980640) | #28 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 53
|
Ok, OK.........a little harsh for a first post from me there, but you have to admit it's kind of amusing that the driving of a world champion is critiqued so much. Same with JPM's driving for that matter.
These guys are in a pressure cooker all race weekend. Add to that racing on the streets of Monaco, and you could see why mistakes get made. Every top driver has cracked under the pressure before, even the late Senna who seems to be beyond reproach on this forum. What, don't you remember him tossing it away at the tunnel entrance having already lapped almost the entire field? I've been reading this forum long enough to know how it "works", I just have always found it funny how the hatred for MS and JPM from various camps boils over after races. I'm not surprised though, I used to shout at the TV when Prost was racing against that weasel Senna. It's all good, though. You know it was an exciting race when the threads go pages long about the events that took place. F1 is in obvious need of races like that, as opposed to some of the yawners we've seen recently. Last edited by KaiserSose; 24 May 2004 at 01:20. |
||
__________________
Chasing steelhead is a disease. I'm sick. |
24 May 2004, 01:53 (Ref:980651) | #29 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 80
|
if you look at the broken bits on MS's car Juan must have nearly been past him when they hit. I think all fans should be greatful that neither driver was hurt as had Juan hit the back of him at whatever speed it was it would have been very ugly.
|
|
__________________
Growing old is inevitable, growing up is optional. |
24 May 2004, 03:00 (Ref:980689) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,511
|
Looked like an everyday motorway crash to me. Both drivers must be feeling a little silly about the whole thing.
|
||
__________________
What if there were no hypothetical questions? |
24 May 2004, 03:11 (Ref:980697) | #31 | ||
Registered User
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
|
||
|
24 May 2004, 03:29 (Ref:980705) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 706
|
Am I missing something here, but isn't that Michael could crash his car while following the SAFETY car inexcusable?
(and yes, I am attributing FULL BLAME to Michael - the Safety car didn't slow, Juan took what appeared to be all humanly possible avoiding action). Isn't the point of the SAFETY car to allow the field to circulate in a SAFE manner and allow the circuit workers to clear obstructions (ie waved yellows apply for the entire lap). For somebody of his experience to do something so dangerous during this time (and at that place) is reprehensiable and surely should result in a reprimand from the FIA. Putting it another way, what if some rookie had of done the same thing - would he retain his superlicense? |
||
__________________
"If a man could be crossed with a cat, it would improve the man but deteriorate the cat." Mark Twain |
24 May 2004, 03:30 (Ref:980706) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,565
|
I also do not think JP is to blame. Michael could not have picked a worse place to try to generate some heat. A little brain fart on his part today. He's only human.
|
||
|
24 May 2004, 03:48 (Ref:980718) | #34 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 706
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If a man could be crossed with a cat, it would improve the man but deteriorate the cat." Mark Twain |
24 May 2004, 05:49 (Ref:980783) | #35 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 234
|
Two brothers at same point...what a particular day of racing.
|
||
|
24 May 2004, 07:37 (Ref:980844) | #36 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,304
|
It was a mistake simple as that, but at Monaco there is NO margin for error, what maybe a simple 'off' or slide at any other track is an accident and retirement here.
MS wasn't under any direct pressure, in that JPM was a lap down, but I think he was under pressure to put in some fast laps in the hope that Ross Brawn's strategy would unwind, maybe he was focused on that as we know that one of the keys to Ferrari success is Schumachers ability to put in very fast laps at critical periods. In the preview we mentioned the wisdom of trying to get a strategy to unwind at Monaco, due to traffic, etc and here was an example of it. |
||
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....' |
24 May 2004, 07:42 (Ref:980849) | #37 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
It was Montoya's fault. Schumacher accelerated and broke many times before to warm up his tyres. Trulli saw that, and kept distance. Montoya didn't, so he was sleeping.
Last edited by Pingguest; 24 May 2004 at 07:45. |
||
|
24 May 2004, 08:30 (Ref:980893) | #38 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,959
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
24 May 2004, 08:32 (Ref:980898) | #39 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
And there is no point saying he did not lock up his brakes as why else would he have veered to the wall and consequently, stopping Montoya from avoiding the collision by going around the outside. |
||
|
24 May 2004, 08:59 (Ref:980925) | #40 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,867
|
Well, it doesn't really matter, Montoya shouldn't be that close behind anyway. Schumacher did a mistake, but if Montoya wasn't 5 meters behind him all would end with a little bit of embarrassment and that's it. Many said that Schumacher made a mistake heating the tyres and brakes in the tunnel and that is true, but how stupid was of Montoya following so close and doing precisely the same?
Anyway, here's what Trulli saw and he was just behind them: Quote:
Oh yes, and this one: Quote:
Last edited by Red; 24 May 2004 at 09:02. |
||||
|
24 May 2004, 09:06 (Ref:980930) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,167
|
God bless Grandprix.com telling it like it is :
when Michael Schumacher's Ferrari appeared from the Monte Carlo tunnel having been punched firmly on the nose, the Media Centre raised a spontaneous cheer, a sign perhaps that Ferrari has done everything right in F1 in recent years, except to win hearts and minds |
||
|
24 May 2004, 09:12 (Ref:980935) | #42 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,959
|
That sounds slightly churlish of the journo's, but I think Ferrari should take it as a compliment in many ways.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
24 May 2004, 09:23 (Ref:980944) | #43 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
24 May 2004, 09:29 (Ref:980948) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,195
|
Montoya must have seen that Michael was acclerating very hard, so should have known that Michael was going to brake very hard too.
|
||
|
24 May 2004, 09:43 (Ref:980959) | #45 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,959
|
Pigguest, I love your bolding. Here is the same quote:
Quote:
All a bit silly really, as Gaz said. Last edited by Adam43; 24 May 2004 at 09:43. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
24 May 2004, 09:52 (Ref:980968) | #46 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,223
|
Quote:
Schumi's response: Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
24 May 2004, 10:11 (Ref:980982) | #47 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
I can't understans why Michael was accelerating and braking so hard in the tunnel, considering that there was still half a lap left to warm up his tyres and brakes. He couldn't afford to lock up his tyres, because he needed them to be right in order to break away enough to get a 20+-second lead on Trulli and Button.
It was a hazardous move, and it didn't look like JPM was any closer to Michael than Trulli was to him. Montoya went practically into the barriers on the opposite side in the attempt to avoid Michael's car, but it still wasn't enough. I'd lay the blame with Michael for this one. An aspect of this that no-one appears to ahve considered, though, is that, when Michael went out it made Trulli the leader, which meant that Montoya was no longer a lap down,a dn would've been able to drive as fast as he could to get clsoer to the back of the pack? Has he inadvertantly discovered a loophole that other drivers can use to get a lap back? |
||
|
24 May 2004, 10:15 (Ref:980985) | #48 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 43,959
|
It seems to me that MS and JPM are being pretty reasonable about it.
|
||
__________________
Brum brum |
24 May 2004, 10:15 (Ref:980987) | #49 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,264
|
cant really remember seeing drivers lock up there brakes like that when behind a pacecar - is michael for real
|
||
|
24 May 2004, 10:20 (Ref:980998) | #50 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,223
|
Quote:
|
||
|
Tags |
jpm |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Montoya incident this morning. | Knowlesy | Formula One | 94 | 26 May 2005 17:03 |
Schumacher vs Montoya | renault110 | Formula One | 9 | 6 Apr 2001 11:07 |