Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

View Poll Results: Do you think that we should have even amount of manufactures in the championship?
Yes 9 36.00%
No 11 44.00%
No preference 5 20.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 Jan 2010, 04:51 (Ref:2614929)   #1
kittle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
kittle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fair Manufacturer Representation (merged)

I would like to put forward my thoughts on the fairness of the championship in relation to manufactures.

Now we have this year 10 Ford teams and 19 Holden teams. Now I don't think that we are heading the right way be having this allowed. The right way would be to have 30 licences and have it 50/50 so that both manufactures get the maximum exposure or even have it fare if and when we get a new manufacture come in to have it even when selling new or existing licences.

I Just think that this year we are going at it the wrong way and I think it will just create an unfair advantage to the manufactures on both levels from ford pulling out because there are to many Holden’s and Holden pulling out because there is no competition.

Let me know what your thoughts are.
kittle is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 05:05 (Ref:2614930)   #2
kittle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
kittle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fair Manufactures

i think that we need to even up the playing field with manufactures.
kittle is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 05:25 (Ref:2614932)   #3
gomick
Race Official
Veteran
 
gomick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Australia
Gobur 3719...
Posts: 10,264
gomick should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridgomick should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridgomick should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
You mean for example there should be 16 Ford's & 16 Holden's i presume... Reckon it would be better if there where some Toyota's thrown into the mix...
gomick is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 05:29 (Ref:2614933)   #4
anthony81901
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 1,105
anthony81901 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think this has been discussed to death. Simple reason we have more Holden teams is that over the years Holden has supported more teams than Ford has. If you look back over the past 40 years, Ford has come and gone on numerous occasions while there have always been Holden supported teams.

Ford scored an own goal when they elected to drop 888 and gifted the category's best performing team to Holden.
anthony81901 is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 05:30 (Ref:2614934)   #5
kittle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
kittle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thats right even amount of ford and holdens or even if we do have more makes come in to the championship.
kittle is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 05:34 (Ref:2614935)   #6
kittle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
kittle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i am not talking about if there should be manufacture support anthony. just based on licences from v8sca. whether it is 1 2 3 manufactures or not. should be even amount of makes racing.
kittle is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 05:49 (Ref:2614938)   #7
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,043
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Teams should be free to run what cars they like. Assigning cars to licences will just cause problems later on. Holden have been prepared to back more cars & give better deals on parts etc, so naturally there will be more of them on the grid. I don't see it as a problem issue (and i'm a Ford man)

Just because Ford has less cars doesn't mean there won't be Fords competitive. No one will notice the ratio if there are cars from both marques at the pointy end, the fact that there are 19 Holdens and 10 Fords will be a nothing matter.

In 1993 there were only 4 Fords and about 104 Holdens, yet the Fords took the top 3 spots in the championship (Seton, Jones & Bowe), and the other one finished 5th (Johnson)
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 06:31 (Ref:2614943)   #8
Tourer
Veteran
 
Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Sideways
Posts: 4,591
Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!
You need a third choice along the lines of "I don't care if the numbers are even or not as long as the racing is good".
Tourer is offline  
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 07:20 (Ref:2614949)   #9
Falcadore
Veteran
 
Falcadore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 2,725
Falcadore should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
[QUOTE=kittle;2614929]I would like to put forward my thoughts on the fairness of the championship in relation to manufactures.

Show me someone who says motorsport is fair, and I'll show you a liar.

Motorsport isn't fair. It isn't supposed to be. You get any and every advantage you can, and you win. Anything else is secondary. This is V8 Supercar, not club level racing. This is professional sport. Fair is for frankly, amateurs.

I know it sounds harsh. But there you are.
Falcadore is offline  
__________________
Mark Alan Jones
Opinionated Human
My opinions only have the power you give them
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 07:30 (Ref:2614953)   #10
Tourer
Veteran
 
Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Australia
Sideways
Posts: 4,591
Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!Tourer is going for a new lap record!
Totally agree Falcadore.

I can't see how or why having even numbers would make any difference to the quality of the racing.

Forcing teams to run one make or another depending on the REC could put teams in a difficult financial position - not what is needed.

As long as the racing is good and both makes have an equal chance of winning IF RUN PROPERLY then I can't see what the problem is with uneven numbers.

Has happened before will happen again.
Tourer is offline  
__________________
“We’re far from having too much horsepower…[m]y definition of too much horsepower is when all four wheels are spinning in every gear.” ― Mark Donohue
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 07:46 (Ref:2614957)   #11
peckstar
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Cayman Islands
Posts: 16,040
peckstar has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Im with Tourer
peckstar is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 08:49 (Ref:2614984)   #12
anthony81901
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2003
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 1,105
anthony81901 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by racer69 View Post
In 1993 there were only 4 Fords and about 104 Holdens, yet the Fords took the top 3 spots in the championship (Seton, Jones & Bowe), and the other one finished 5th (Johnson)
Likewise in 1995 there were 9 Holdens vs 7 Fords that competed in all rounds and in 1997 8 Holdens vs 6 Fords, yet Ford won in those years.
anthony81901 is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 10:04 (Ref:2615013)   #13
cavvy
Veteran
 
cavvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location:
Melbourne Victoria
Posts: 3,546
cavvy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Nissan didnt need even numbers to win .. its a crock !!
cavvy is offline  
__________________
more torque than a climate change conference
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 10:05 (Ref:2615014)   #14
Axeman444
Veteran
 
Axeman444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Australia
Calling a spade a spade...
Posts: 4,117
Axeman444 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAxeman444 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i think if you look at page3 of the results sheet broadcast on Ch7 last year (ie 21st-29th) you will see it was predominately Red for Holden... can't see it changing this year, so moot point, leave it, who cares
Axeman444 is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 10:05 (Ref:2615015)   #15
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,613
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourer View Post
You need a third choice along the lines of "I don't care if the numbers are even or not as long as the racing is good".
.......and another choice if you are happy to watch a V8 supercar version of commodore cup.
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 10:09 (Ref:2615019)   #16
Axeman444
Veteran
 
Axeman444's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Australia
Calling a spade a spade...
Posts: 4,117
Axeman444 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridAxeman444 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by peckstar View Post
Im with Tourer
+1
Axeman444 is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 11:15 (Ref:2615052)   #17
HSVDT
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Australia
Gold Coast
Posts: 35
HSVDT should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by kittle View Post
I would like to put forward my thoughts on the fairness of the championship in relation to manufactures.

Now we have this year 10 Ford teams and 19 Holden teams. Now I don't think that we are heading the right way be having this allowed. The right way would be to have 30 licences and have it 50/50 so that both manufactures get the maximum exposure or even have it fare if and when we get a new manufacture come in to have it even when selling new or existing licences.

I Just think that this year we are going at it the wrong way and I think it will just create an unfair advantage to the manufactures on both levels from ford pulling out because there are to many Holden’s and Holden pulling out because there is no competition.

Let me know what your thoughts are.
kittle, I honestly don't see how it's unfair when it only differs by 1. For 2008 and 2009 the grid was made up of 18 Holdens vs 11 Fords and this year only sees 1 extra car for Holden and 1 less car for Ford.

As others have rightly pointed out had Ford not dropped the ball you may possibly of seen a 16 Holden vs 13 Ford grid for this season but at the end of the day drivers will go were the $$$$ are irrespective of the marque.
HSVDT is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 11:40 (Ref:2615060)   #18
STEALTHY
Veteran
 
STEALTHY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Australia
SA - The Custom Plate State
Posts: 3,137
STEALTHY should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Threads like these make me lol. Guess i'm not getting my 2010 wish granted.
STEALTHY is offline  
__________________
V8Supercars - Race cars using road car headlights, for decades ;)
'You holden VT drivers better look out, because the Ford AU is coming to get you' Glenn Seton - 1999 (The original egg on face disclaimer) :roflmao:
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 11:55 (Ref:2615065)   #19
Rombles1
Veteran
 
Rombles1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Australia
Facebook
Posts: 1,940
Rombles1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
No Stealthy, you are not.

Go Holden. :P
Rombles1 is offline  
__________________
HSV - Sideways cars from an upside down country.
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 12:11 (Ref:2615078)   #20
rik
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 590
rik should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
[QUOTE=HSVDT;2615052
As others have rightly pointed out had Ford not dropped the ball you may possibly of seen a 16 Holden vs 13 Ford grid for this season but at the end of the day drivers will go were the $$$$ are irrespective of the marque.[/QUOTE]

And when Ford only wants to sponsor 4 cars like in 2009, why should they get the benefit of 50% of the grid?

If Ford want more Falcons on the grid, then they need to resume sponsoring more teams like they did in the past!
rik is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 12:17 (Ref:2615084)   #21
peckstar
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Cayman Islands
Posts: 16,040
peckstar has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
as we keep saying only need one falcon on the grid, and we have ten
peckstar is offline  
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 20:53 (Ref:2615327)   #22
RotorFan
Veteran
 
RotorFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Australia
Sydney
Posts: 2,208
RotorFan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
To be fair, all manufacturers that sell cars in this country should be represented.
RotorFan is offline  
__________________
Phil Mills: 30, 6-Left-Plus Over-Crest-Long, Opens-Over-Crest 100, COW-COW, 100, 6-Left-Minus Extra-Long

Fabrizio Giovanardi: I have like a banana - is the yellow car in front - that make me, you know, running like the monkey, running for the banana. When I see yellow in front, I just pushing harder and harder. I want that banana.
Quote
Old 18 Jan 2010, 21:27 (Ref:2615350)   #23
bluesport
Veteran
 
bluesport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Australia
Posts: 3,613
bluesport User had had their licence endorsedbluesport User had had their licence endorsed
Quote:
Originally Posted by RotorFan View Post
To be fair, all manufacturers that sell cars in this country should be represented.
+1
bluesport is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Jan 2010, 00:40 (Ref:2615457)   #24
Mixer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location:
Surry Hills, NSW
Posts: 6,704
Mixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridMixer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
If you want equal Ford/Holden franchises then you need more manufacturer input to provide an equal base.

Holden supports more teams and Ford keeps burning teams so the situation is as it is. I also think it has ended up that way because HRT has been supplying very good customer cars and FPR/SBR are both questionable in that regard.

I think the most important thing is the competitive teams on both sides are a little more equitable, DJR/SBR/FPR vs HRT/888/GRM/PMM/KRT I guess and the rest are also-rans.
Mixer is offline  
Quote
Old 19 Jan 2010, 00:49 (Ref:2615462)   #25
kittle
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 804
kittle should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Whose the liar falcadore???
kittle is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hamilton's Spa penalty - fair?/ Massa Handed Win..Merged ralf fan Formula One 1005 18 Sep 2008 14:20
Now that's hardly fair! Hazza Bike Racing 8 19 Mar 2007 16:56
Predictions WRC 2003 - Champion driver and manufacturer (merged) SJ Spode Rallying & Rallycross 30 10 Feb 2003 17:43
It is not fair........ rdjones Formula One 1 17 Apr 2002 10:57


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:51.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.