Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 31 Jan 2002, 22:00 (Ref:207818)   #1
Valve Bounce
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Home :)
Posts: 7,491
Valve Bounce has been held in scrutiny for further testing
Testing Times: what we can learn

There are always duscussions on what fast test times mean. Many here, including me, have said "tests are tests and nothing else". Well, that is not quite true really - I do SOMETIMES tend to be facetious to cheer the forum up. Basically, this year's test times show us that the usual suspects: Ferrari, McLaren and Williams are right up there at the top of the tree and will finish in the top three positions at the end of the year (so tell me something new ). We can also see that some teams have been struggling and they won't get anywhere this year, and this brigade will be lead by none other than BAR and brought up by Minardi or Toyota. What we havn't learned is how good Jordan and Jaguar are - something that quals will clarify. Then there is Renault, the team that IMO testing will tell us nothing simply because this team could have a very steep improvement curve during the year including this testing season. The one bright hope this year is Sauber, which, apart from their blistering test times in qualifying set up, has shown at least that they are right behind the top three. I respect Sauber because they have a very efficient Swiss team (Like a Rolex), great management, and possibly the best engine at the start of this season. And of course there is Nick Heidfeld, who I see will be the revelation of this year and who I am predicting will finish with more points than Kimi this year. This testing is the only game in town for the next month so we might as well put in our two bob's worth.
Valve Bounce is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 22:03 (Ref:207824)   #2
Damon
Veteran
 
Damon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Hampshire, England
Posts: 5,577
Damon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I'm afraid I have to go with your initial comment VB. Tests are tests and little else. They are unlikely to tell us anything about the season ahead. Remember that Prost lead the tests this time last year.
Damon is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 22:20 (Ref:207849)   #3
Speedworx
Veteran
 
Speedworx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
United Kingdom
Northamptonshire
Posts: 4,553
Speedworx should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tests are just tests!

They are always a chance to meet up with friends.
Speedworx is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 22:34 (Ref:207865)   #4
nreed
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 66
nreed should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
i agree with damon and hakkiman, prost did lead testing last year, and we all know how that turned out, especially after alesi left
nreed is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 22:48 (Ref:207876)   #5
BD
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location:
Chicago, IL
Posts: 289
BD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Tests right now can give some insight, but when a lower team sets the pace, it doesnt mean much. When a team like Sauber goes 100%(qualifying trim) they are gonna set some fast times.

Usually during testing, the teams are driving around 80-90% of what they are capable of.
Sometimes during the span of a 3 day test, a team's time will go down by 3 or 4 seconds by the last day. Same car, same engine, same drivers, different set ups, different parts.
BD is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 23:12 (Ref:207888)   #6
Ferrari2002
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
stoke-on-trent
Posts: 7
Ferrari2002 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Ferrari2002 is offline  
__________________
Add
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 23:14 (Ref:207889)   #7
Ferrari2002
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
stoke-on-trent
Posts: 7
Ferrari2002 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
how can tests just be test they would not do them if they didnt need to remember how much money it costs to test a car .
Ferrari2002 is offline  
__________________
Add
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 23:28 (Ref:207899)   #8
Valve Bounce
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Home :)
Posts: 7,491
Valve Bounce has been held in scrutiny for further testing
I fully agree that testing times are not definitive. However, when a team keeps posting slow times, sooner or later it must test at close to top speed to get accurate information, and if such teams just never get those really comparable times to the top teams, then there is a good chance that they are in some sort of strife and will not do any good at the start of the season. As for Prost last year, many here picked that they were running light to get sponsors, while McLaren were sandbagging quite a lot. However, teeh big three have all posted fast times this year, and they will remain the big three - that much we can tell.
Valve Bounce is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2002, 23:44 (Ref:207905)   #9
Adam43
14th
1% Club
 
Adam43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
European Union
New Orleans
Posts: 43,271
Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally posted by Ferrari2002
how can tests just be test they would not do them if they didnt need to remember how much money it costs to test a car .
Obviously all the teams test for a reason. To make the car better.

However I think the issue is whether we, as outsiders, can tell anything from testing by just looking at the times and reading the reports.

I think we can, but it's all a bit vague. At best it can give us generalisations.

Now hindsight, that's what we really need.
Adam43 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Feb 2002, 00:00 (Ref:207911)   #10
Raven
Veteran
 
Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
England
Posts: 1,473
Raven should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree it's hard to draw conclusions from testing. However, after a series of tests you can look at, and generally see who is hot/not.
i.e
What actual times were set - how do they compare to last years race/qualifying times?

Cars reliability - are some cars breaking down a lot?

Obviously there are counter-arguments to these questions such as were the cars legal, are some teams sandbagging and what were the test aims, etc.
Raven is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Testing Times 04 Feb 05 f1_carzy Formula One 22 4 Feb 2005 21:28
Donny testing times cos Touring Car Racing 9 18 Mar 2004 15:30
F3 testing times in Jap John Weed National & International Single Seaters 8 23 Feb 2004 13:20
So what did we learn from Testing? Valve Bounce Formula One 15 12 Feb 2002 11:09
Testing Times.... Lee Purnell National & Club Racing 1 23 Mar 2000 22:32


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:27.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.