![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 135
![]() |
big head schumacher
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
![]() ![]() ![]() |
He might be immodest but what he says is perfectly true. He has got the knack of getting right on the limit virtually straight away - many F1 people have said so.
On balance I think the liklihood of his scoring more poles under this system is less - but that's because of the luck element with changing track conditions. I would have thought we'll see more pole-winners in 2003 because of this, since the changing of ambient and track conditions sometimes makes more difference than a driver can make. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,181
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: big head schumacher
Quote:
Make that 5 WDC's and 64 GP wins thus far. On luck? That has got to be the most incredible run of luck in history. |
|||
![]() |
__________________
"And the most important thing is that we, the Vettels, the Bernies, whoever, should not destroy our own sport by making stupid comments about the ******* noise." - Niki Lauda ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,245
![]() |
One of those five WDCs due to illegal maneuver !..., not only luck.
|
||
![]() |
__________________
"ignorantia legis neminem excusat" ![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,421
![]() |
Re: Re: big head schumacher
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,577
![]() |
probably best we don't start this one.
|
||
![]() |
__________________
Brought to you by Glagnar's Human Rinds: "A-bunch-a-munch-crunch-a-human" ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It is wrong for him to like the look of something he believes will maximise his chances of winning? I am not convinced I agree with him completely, but that in istelf is not relevant.
Oh, lol, it has just reminded of a situation I have come across various times which I always think is rather amusing. When if Michael wins a race because it is wet, people refer to him as being "lucky" it was wet. I had always thought that if his natural ability turns out togive him an advantage in such a situation then it is earned on merit an skill, as opposed to luck, but there you go... :-p |
||
![]() |
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,602
![]() ![]() |
For all the assistance he gets with his good results....i think its fair to say that he can produce blindinly fast laps even on his out laps.
|
|
![]() |
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front ! ![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,073
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We made it to the 4th posting before there was a single comment about how Michael used an illegal manuever! What does that have to do with his comment about qualifying?
Mods, is there a way to adjust the auto-censor to delete words like "Jerez" "Team Orders" and "Contract?" Meanwhile, back at the thread: I think Michael is up for the challenge of setting an in-your-face fast lap and then seeing if anyone can knock him off. If the F2003 is even an incremental step forward from the F2002, qualifying may be more interesting than the race itself. |
||
![]() |
__________________
"He's still a young guy and I always think, slightly morbidly, the last thing you learn is how to die and at the end of the day everybody learns every single day." - The Ever-Cheerfull Ron Dennis on Lewis Hamilton. ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,602
![]() ![]() |
i can see many poles being taken between Micheal and Juan next year ...but more for Micheal i think.
|
|
![]() |
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front ! ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Taking the leap of faith that Ferrari will be further ahead next year than they were this, due to their alliance coming into its first "full" year, I can see rather a lot of poles for Michael.
Let us take a situation where there were at least two teams close at the top, and then this situation occured it could be another matter. If you think to years like '98, for example, then Michael would quite often make mistakes because he was having to push to hard to get close enough in qualifying to have a chance in the race. That isn't going to be the case next year though, so it may well be decided by running orders and weather etc. I imagine there to be some interesting tactics deployed on the Fridays in certain situations, like Monaco for instance. It could be fub, although it would be one hell of a lot better if they had just left it be if this was there alternative. Surely just two sessions where the times are aggregated, or averaged, would be the best solution? It has the effect of making people go properly on Friday as it were, which the new system quite possibly won't in my view, but doesn't make the whole damned affair manufactured. |
||
![]() |
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. ![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I hope Ferrari will bite the dust next year, with many engine blow ups, bad tyrecompounds on every GP and a very disobeying Rubens...
What a nice dream, isn't it? ![]() Last edited by ASCII Man; 29 Oct 2002 at 20:32. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,602
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front ! ![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, he doesn't necessarily be allowed to, maybe we could see another Pironi then, and see what Ferrari would do about it...
They would probably kick him out or give him very underpowered/unreliable engines... Or a severe paycut.. Last edited by ASCII Man; 29 Oct 2002 at 20:51. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,245
![]() |
Rubens will qualify better than Michael next year... (I hope...) due to those changes on Quals.
|
||
![]() |
__________________
"ignorantia legis neminem excusat" ![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,702
![]() |
I think the one lap wonders will be the ex USA drivers, JV and JM. Did they not have that in Indy ? Plus JM seems to get it all together for that last lap.
MS sets a good pace but then has to play catch up. If JM (and JV) have it together by Friday PM they will get pole. However as normal all hopes will die in a cloud of blue smoke in the race. Simon |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() As for the "superpole" TGF is very quick in his first laps, but Juan Pablo isn't exactly slow either. I don't think that this new system will necessarily go against Juan Pablo. |
|||
![]() |
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! ![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't think the new system will benefit anyone, and the qualifying order will probably remain the same, but it does seem that TGF could have more poles as HE IS quicker out of the box. But considering that they now have all Friday to set their cars up...
|
||
![]() |
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! ![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,565
![]() |
With this qualifying format, I think it more likely that we will have the 2 Ferrari's, followed by the 2 Williams', followed by the 2 Macs', followed by the 2.....you get the idea. With no traffic, you might think that 2 'identically" prepared cars would end up pretty close in times, unless, of course, the difference in quality of the 2 drivers is more than usual.
Weather would be the biggest factor. How will the starting order be determined? Names in a hat? |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 251
![]() |
The cigarette companies are getting a bit shaky over the recent billion dollar personal lawsuits. As there is a major one pending involving Marlboro, and as Schumacher is paid directly by Marlboro, it would be terrible if they called in the chips and asked him to hand back some of the booty to help settle claims. I don’t know how I’d sleep if this happened!
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,602
![]() ![]() |
i think the new system will be good for Juan...but i think it will be even better for Micheal
|
|
![]() |
__________________
MOTOR RACING ...The general idea is that the driver behind uses all his Skills, Tricks and Courage to try and overtake the guy ( or Girl ) in front ! ![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,038
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just imagine for one moment that Michael goes out and does his blistering one lap qually. Then, Rubens goes out, in sectors one and two he's up on Michaels time, how long before a faceless name in the Ferrari transporter adjusts the engine mapping to 'slow' Rubens in the last two sectors thus giving Michael pole?
This is not an attack on Michael or Ferrari, the same arguement could be levelled at all F1 teams. I am merely pointing out that even qualifying can be 'rigged' to accomodate team orders! |
||
![]() |
__________________
The Priest Catcher Honoured recipient of the BARC Browning Medal ![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 493
![]() |
Quote:
If you go to AtlasF1 forum, they have already been discussing this. Someone got the stats from this year, and if you take the best times after 1 completed run Michael would have had 8 poles. JPM on the other hand would have only had two. Dont get me wrong, JPM will still get poles next year. But I also think he'll have a few midfield starts. Michael will tend to be around the top 3 consistently. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||||||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,643
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: big head schumacher
Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
![]() Even playing along with this 'conspiracy theory', Ferrari would'nt risk locking out the front row for Michaels benefit. Quote:
I'm predicting Montoya 7, Michael 5, Rubins 3 and at least one suprise ![]() Quote:
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
__________________
#Keepfightingmichael ![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: big head schumacher
Quote:
Last edited by Glen; 30 Oct 2002 at 10:18. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Best in F1 vs. the Rest: MS goes head to head in identical equipment | enemy-ace | Rallying & Rallycross | 73 | 6 Dec 2004 21:04 |
Head to head qualify | f1matrix | Formula One | 22 | 18 Jun 2004 05:31 |
Schumacher and his fast head | enemy-ace | Formula One | 27 | 24 Feb 2002 20:35 |