|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
15 Jan 2004, 23:48 (Ref:839793) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,399
|
IMSA delaying introduction of 2004 LMP regs
Just posted on DSC. Good news for some of the current ALMS competitors for sure.
|
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 00:19 (Ref:839816) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
But slightly worrying, in the longer term. Might it not condemn the ALMS to old, out-of-date equipment, and have the teams lagging behind their European counterparts? I'd hate to see the ALMS as Europe's poor relation.
|
||
__________________
Interviewer: "Will the McLaren F1 be your answer to the Ferrari F40?" Gordon Murray: "Hmm... I don't think we have anyone at McLaren who can weld that badly..." |
16 Jan 2004, 00:43 (Ref:839849) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Is this with the blessing of the ACO.
In 2004 at least what actual difference will this make? Current cars only need to run a slightly smaller rear wing and fual tank afterall. |
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 01:04 (Ref:839863) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
What is driving this? Competitors?
|
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 01:24 (Ref:839876) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,900
|
this really doesnt make much sense to me. all the LMP teams would be in the same boat, changing the wings and fuel tank. there was no 2004 spec LMP1 car anywhere. The only diffrence now is that the MG's are back in LMP675. which could turn out to be worse. How many LMP900's?
1x champion, 1x AutoCon and 1x Intersport R&S. 3 LMP900 cars! then there would be 8-9 LMP675 cars... really doesnt make sense for the alms to do this! |
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 03:01 (Ref:839923) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 399
|
Im sure the Lola MG's will run in the LMP1 class...
I suspect they are keeping the old rules since there are no new cars. Whats gained by having all the present LMP teams changing to the shorter wings... |
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 03:43 (Ref:839943) | #7 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
|
My guess is that this has mostly to do with Dyson. I think they were pretty ticked off after being told no change would happen and then they did extensive testing (remember the 3 days at Sebring after the season?). I think there may have been a chance they might have withdrawn after what they may have perceived as a bs move. If I have it straight Dyson was one of the teams NOT to accept their auto entry for 2004 (along with Joest and Bentley) after saying last year they really wanted to do Le Mans in 2004.
Smart move to leave things status quo with no new LMPs coming on board. It also shows a willingness by the ACO to be able to "help" ALMS instead of it always being the other way. Maybe some second thoughts by the ACO on the effect the LMES is appearing to have on ALMS has made them realize that helping ALMS as a partner is in their best interest. Last edited by BobN; 16 Jan 2004 at 03:46. |
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 03:48 (Ref:839945) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 399
|
Another question what happens to the "Euro" teams that will be running the 2004 spec's but what to come over for Sebring etc.? I guess they will have to change the cars depending what side of the atlantic there on...
|
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 04:15 (Ref:839953) | #9 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
|
PAt, that would seem to be the case. Again, because there are no new LMP1s for 2004 it shouldn't be a problem for those theams either. They should all have set up info for 2003 packages. Being Sebring preceeds all the LMES races they won't be doing a back and forth in configurations or fuel stratagies.
|
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 04:22 (Ref:839956) | #10 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 209
|
I hate to say this, but there won't be no ALMS 3 years from now if they continue doing what their are doing.
I'm not going to the races this year anymore. I prefer to see 10 prototypes in some european event on TV then 3 prototypes live. Last edited by awegrzyn; 16 Jan 2004 at 04:23. |
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 04:34 (Ref:839962) | #11 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 50
|
at the moment there is NO tv deal to cover the LMES, and with no prize money or start money you might struggle to see 10 prototypes in Europe
|
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 04:40 (Ref:839965) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 521
|
IMO, IMSA HAS to become part of a real international championship to survive. Right now, it is nothing more than a north American series that happens to have the same rules as Le Mans.
A series like IMSA that is based on technology rather than managed competition can't survive without new cars in the class that shows off that technology. If there is going to be a battle of G/A and IMSA for survival in north America, G/A will win. IF a true world championship was formed, AND it was marketed and promoted as well as F1, then and only then would an American car maker actually consider building a prototype. NASCAR gives GM, Ford and Chrysler alll the north American exposure they need. They have no need to spend a cent on a north American VERSION of a European series. |
||
__________________
I specialize in the history of small displacement sports racers from France and Italy, circa 1930-1960. |
16 Jan 2004, 09:14 (Ref:840097) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,399
|
This was always going to be an interim year - This is a VERY sensible move by the ALMS to retain current competitors whilst the sportscar scene settles down.
And yes btw this is with the ACO's blessing. |
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 13:00 (Ref:840293) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,451
|
"Managed Competition" -- you mean "Race Fixing"? Since when did we decide REAL competition was not a part of racing anymore?
For those who believe racing is entertainment and only entetainment, a pre-scripted event will be fine -- the Harlem Globetrotters draw very well whenever they come to town, and so does the WWF. But for those of us who like RACING, "managed competition" will never be satisfactory. I agree we ought to go international. I plan to go international in June, as usual. |
||
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore |
16 Jan 2004, 13:31 (Ref:840337) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Ratel, it's your turn now - get a move on!
|
||
__________________
Oops |
16 Jan 2004, 13:52 (Ref:840372) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
PatB - I highly doubt those that are using the "European" regs will need to change to be legal. They will likely have the option to do as they choose.
dscwall - It would seem between the two classes LMP1, & LMP2 there will be at least 12 LMP's at each event in the ALMS. |
||
|
16 Jan 2004, 20:39 (Ref:840858) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
And 14+ LMP1s and 5+ LMP2s in LMES.
I don't think theres been start/prize money in any European racing for a long time. Last edited by JAG; 16 Jan 2004 at 20:40. |
|
|
16 Jan 2004, 21:59 (Ref:840959) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
What about American Spirit? Were they not preparing two cars according to LMP2 rules? That certainly throws a wrench in the works for their 2004 campaign doesn't it?
|
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
16 Jan 2004, 23:08 (Ref:841045) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
Besides, IF a car is purchased that conforms to 2004 regs to run by anyone (ie. the new Lola), it won't be turned away. This change is to be inclusive of all, and minimize costs of change and testing that would be required. Two thumbs up for the change. |
|||
|
16 Jan 2004, 23:27 (Ref:841064) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Also, the current LMP2 regs encompass the old 675 regs so the old aluminium tubbed 675s are now called "LMP2". I don't think AmSpirit will actually convert those Lolas to "new" LMP2, they will still be 675s.
|
||
__________________
Oops |
17 Jan 2004, 03:38 (Ref:841178) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 521
|
I still don't quite understand, so maybe someone can explain exactly what the rules change delay means...
Let's say Team "X", running to 2003 rules (at 675 kg and with larger wing) wins the small displacement prototypes class at Sebring (regardless if the choose to still call it LM675 or LMP2)....Will they have to increase the weight to 750kg and make the other modifications as per 2004 ACO rules to run in the LMP2 class at Le Mans? |
||
__________________
I specialize in the history of small displacement sports racers from France and Italy, circa 1930-1960. |
18 Jan 2004, 07:40 (Ref:842119) | #22 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
I don't see any mention of the 750 kgs thing anywhere now... oh, sorry ! The new chassis are 750 kgs balanced : Courage C65 at least...
|
||
|
18 Jan 2004, 09:34 (Ref:842159) | #23 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
It's a tired tune but the GT and GTS class are just more attractive to the "new" manufacturers. So goes the LMP... |
||
|
19 Jan 2004, 02:21 (Ref:842885) | #24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
19 Jan 2004, 03:17 (Ref:842898) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
how hard is it to set up the championship as international?
the transport costs would be huge back and forth back and forth Europe-NorthAmerica,Europe...maybe Japan...south america unless they do a world trip and start in sebring swing through canada then Spa 1000km, Nurburgring, 1000km Le mans, then US rounds then japan... where is DHL or FedEx or even an airline like Delta, united, Luftansa, Iberia, any one-to be the transport sponsor, oh where oh where... |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
should IMSA take a step away from ACO regs? | cybersdorf | North American Racing | 20 | 4 Oct 2005 15:10 |
2004 Restrictor Regs | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 2 | 23 Oct 2003 16:49 |
Poll 1600ff Regs 2004 | Aysedasi | National & International Single Seaters | 2 | 13 Oct 2003 13:30 |
2004 Prototype Regs | BSchneiderFan | Sportscar & GT Racing | 40 | 23 Feb 2003 08:32 |
2004 Protototype regs. | JAG | Sportscar & GT Racing | 1 | 10 Oct 2002 18:03 |