![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 312
![]() |
That ole C5R
Going through some older images and I can't help but miss the characteristic shape of the C5R in yellow. The car formed such a part of my life (in other words, I have looked at is so so much, through the frame and on the screen).
I bet it will be like that when the last R8 disappears. ![]() And yes I know the C5R is still running with diff teams, it's just not the same. Cheers, Temporarily Nostalgic |
|
![]() |
__________________
Photojournalist ![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The old C5R looked more "virile" than the new C6 too me... I'll miss the old one too... I hope that there'll be customers for the C5R, beyond the one we had at Sebring...
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
![]() ![]() |
Yes they don't make 'em like they used to!
|
||
![]() |
__________________
Oops ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() ![]() Last edited by Fab; 6 Apr 2005 at 09:53. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,152
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm nostalgic for John Grennwood's Corvettes...
|
||
![]() |
__________________
I Travel ![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,793
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
No doubt about it though, the C6.R just doesn't have the racy look of the old C5-R. That car looked mean, and made/makes a lovely contrast to the sleek Prodrive 550, the swoopy Maserati and the classic supercar Saleen. The new car looks goofy in that company. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
![]() ![]() |
I gotta agree with cmk - they've made it so much more "tame" looking. In looks the C5-R was un-tameable!
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,366
![]() ![]() ![]() |
I agree, the C5R IMO looks a lot better than the C6R, the C6R looks very dosile and dosent seem to have any agression in terms of looks.
|
||
![]() |
__________________
Sportscar Racing fans of the world Unite! ![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 138
![]() |
It's already a legend imho. If you could buy one with some winning history it will become very valuable over the next years.
|
||
![]() |
__________________
Racing MaX-5 NL ![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,761
![]() |
the C6.R looks much better in person than in pictures and i kinda dig both cars in their own style
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 390
![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
![]() ![]() |
as long as the 6 sounds like the 5 then i'm happy.
![]() |
|
![]() |
__________________
I want you to drive flat out ![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,143
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() robert |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
![]() |
Quote:
Thunder in paradise. Bob |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,099
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() (The clips from Sebring suggest the C6.R's sound the same?) |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
![]() ![]() |
There was a link to some clips from Sebring on this forum - I can't remember where - the C6-R had the deep grumble in the clip. Don't know if it's the same, because the first time I'll have seen a C5-R will be at Silverstone FIA GT round this year! never mind the C6 just yet lol.
If that's bad enough, I today found out I can't get to Le Mans this year because too many people are already booked off work at that time... :'( |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James ![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,664
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Last edited by Fab; 8 Apr 2005 at 07:09. Reason: Insert the pic... |
||
![]() |
__________________
"Those were the days my friends. We thought they'd never end..." jimclark ![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,761
![]() |
the C5-R and the C6.R sound exactly the same because they share the same engine
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 134
![]() |
Well I liked the c6r better, but I saw a c6 on the way to work today and it did look kinda tame. I guess I'm not a Corvette man
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
![]() ![]() |
That's a beautiful old pic there - I actually saw a road going version in Lincoln today - beautiful noise. It got the whole city centre looking. Great to see some of the old cars like that.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,143
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wow, memories indeed! I was not only at that race at Daytona, but in fact went to high school with some of the people sitting on that van in that background!
The Greenwood Vette was fascinating to watch, it would come out of a corner and there was this tremendous increase in sound as the hammer (never a more appropriate term for 'throttle' then for the one on that huge V8) was dropped. The sound would keep building in intensity but you didn't really notice the car leaping forward unusually; but then the torque would hit those huge rear tires, and the thing would spring forward just booming and blasting away, and would eat up anything else on the track under acceleration. This was all pre chicane at Daytona too, so they went unfettered onto the east banking (Nascar Three/Four), Greenwood always took the very high line, and the tail was ever so slighty cocked out. Bloody impressive! Every other car was mid or lower banking, and it was like watching a hammerhead shark swimming near a school of mullet. The car was equally impressive at Sebring over the bumps, the bouncing and the huge torque causing the rear tires to struggle to maintain grip. This was not conducive to long term service from the drive train.......but it was a great fun to watch that thing thunder on, chased somewhat futiley by the wailing straight sixes in the BMW CSL's, and the hoard of Porsche Carreras, all under the most perfectly blue Florida Spring Sky. Ah.................................................... The CR5 and CR6 are impressive in their own right, but I there was something about the sound and fury of the Greenwood car...... robert Last edited by skycafe; 8 Apr 2005 at 22:42. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,351
![]() |
Quote:
Bob ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |||
![]() Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,143
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Is that car still around? Hey, Jim Clark, I sent you an PM, we seem to have been in the same place at the same time, probably more then once. robert |
|||
![]() |
![]() |