|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Nov 2005, 07:53 (Ref:1457868) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
Why no Dodge Viper SRT10 in GT racing?
Why doesn't Chrysler/Dodge commission someone to build a GT1 version of the Viper SRT10?
It looks like a winner to me... |
||
|
11 Nov 2005, 07:58 (Ref:1457870) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,799
|
Chrysler never came back into sportscars after their failed attempts to win Le Mans with their Dallara prototype. I think with their Mercedes connections all their efforts in F1 I doubt they'll commission the funds. I'm sure Oreca would jump at he chance to race the vipers again. They said they wouldn't do Le Mans unless tey could get factory backing.
|
||
__________________
Nuts on the road! |
11 Nov 2005, 08:10 (Ref:1457875) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,216
|
But Chrysler/Dodge has no programme now and their rival Corvette is doing so well in the ALMS.
Maybe ORECA should do a Prodrive, build the cars, race them and sell loads of them off to other privateers. |
||
|
11 Nov 2005, 10:49 (Ref:1457959) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
How much of the development budget from the original Viper program came from Dodge/Chrysler? It wasn't Oreca. |
||
__________________
If in doubt, keep it flat out. |
11 Nov 2005, 13:54 (Ref:1458121) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Quote:
Back to the main topic - c'mon, Chrysler, bring the Viper back! |
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
11 Nov 2005, 14:07 (Ref:1458137) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
||
|
11 Nov 2005, 15:35 (Ref:1458216) | #7 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,739
|
There are rumours Dodge (together with Prodrive) will enter WTCC in 2007.
|
|
|
11 Nov 2005, 16:19 (Ref:1458263) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
Quote:
Actually, wasn't it Fredoric Dor that funded the 550 program? I thought he basically commissioned Prodrive to build the racecars. But you are correct. Not only would it take a lot of money, you also need the technical capability of Prodrive. |
|||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
12 Nov 2005, 13:24 (Ref:1458852) | #9 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 407
|
What I meant was, that you needed a Fredoric Dor. I just wasn't naming names.
|
|
__________________
If in doubt, keep it flat out. |
12 Nov 2005, 14:33 (Ref:1458909) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Also see this thread: http://tentenths.com/forum/showthrea...ighlight=Viper
|
||
__________________
Oops |
12 Nov 2005, 15:00 (Ref:1458925) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
I dont understand why , in its hayday , no American teams EVER wanted to race a Viper competitivily in the Alms . I will never understand why not ?
Before anyone says it ..... Oreca are NOT an American team . Heaps want to get their mits on a C6R or even a C5R but nobody wanted a Viper when it was a brilliant car |
||
|
12 Nov 2005, 16:01 (Ref:1458958) | #12 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 407
|
Quote:
Of course, the other problem being that with US/French relations at an all time low point, I can't see an American manufacturer wanting to pay a French team to develop and run their cars in the US. Then again, can't think of many American teams they'd want either... |
||
__________________
If in doubt, keep it flat out. |
12 Nov 2005, 20:25 (Ref:1459109) | #13 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
It will take Prodrive to win against Pratt&Miller in ALMS. Right now they have their hands full with the Astons. Penske cannot help either because there will be a conflict of interests with Porsche. Philip |
||
|
13 Nov 2005, 12:55 (Ref:1459561) | #14 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,739
|
Quote:
|
||
|
13 Nov 2005, 15:18 (Ref:1459651) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,750
|
Quote:
Back on topic. I think the reason is that GT racing has moved on since the original Viper was introduced. With cars such as the Mosler, Saleen et al - the sucessful GTs are these days designed as racers first and foremost, and made into road going models as a homologation issue. Turning flabby, over engineered road models into competitive racers is becoming increasingly difficult. |
|||
__________________
I want a hat with "I only wanted one comb" written on it. |
13 Nov 2005, 15:34 (Ref:1459661) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Is there any way to rule over anything so that cars should be designed for the road first? Very difficult, I can well imagine, particularly with where to draw the lines with what's "road-built" and whats "race-built".
I'm not saying that cars such as the Saleens are anything bad - I love the S7's! Fantastic cars - it's just that if cars get designed for the track first then, particularly with projects like the MC12, relations with the road are going to get further away as designers are put under pressure to build race-winning cars, and if it's not controlled properly then the worst case scenario would be the GT1 situation of 7-8 years ago all over again. It's reasons like that which kinda make me pleased that the MC12 was never allowed at Le Mans - nice a car as it is, it's clearly a racer, not a car meant for the road. It's another reason why I'd quite enjoy seeing the SRT-10 in racing. |
||
|
14 Nov 2005, 04:51 (Ref:1460057) | #17 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
The car had Italian license plates, so someone must have driven it a few thousand miles or so. Philip |
||
|
14 Nov 2005, 06:31 (Ref:1460085) | #18 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 201
|
Quote:
Still a very impressive piece of automobile engineering though. |
||
|
14 Nov 2005, 19:36 (Ref:1460606) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 757
|
Maybe it was stolen from Italy to Russia
|
||
|
14 Nov 2005, 19:42 (Ref:1460611) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
...with love...
Just because it's road legal doesn't mean it's actually suitable to be driven on the road. |
||
__________________
Oops |
15 Nov 2005, 05:41 (Ref:1461020) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 626
|
Well Dodge has this turn key racer in the US but they never bothered to get it FIA/ACO approved so it's today only club racer that anyone can buy for $129.000.
Viper Competion Coupe |
||
|
15 Nov 2005, 05:54 (Ref:1461024) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
15 Nov 2005, 06:03 (Ref:1461028) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Engine too big - they'd have to build a run of homologation "specials".
|
||
__________________
Oops |
16 Nov 2005, 01:46 (Ref:1461883) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 626
|
Well don't they already have a engine that legal from the old Viper?
it's not like the Comp Coupe has different engine. |
||
|
16 Nov 2005, 04:27 (Ref:1461960) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,580
|
Except that the legal engine is in a different car, and the one in the actual car is too big. So they'd have to build a series of new Vipers with the old engine (I think).
|
||
__________________
Oops |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[FIA GT] Dodge Viper Comp Coupe FIA approved? | pederb | Sportscar & GT Racing | 12 | 12 Dec 2005 02:23 |
New Dodge?? | gttouring | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 4 | 6 Oct 2004 07:01 |
Dodge Viper SRT-10 Competition Coupe, where does it race? | Zandbak | Sportscar & GT Racing | 19 | 23 Jan 2004 20:59 |
Dodge win #3 | Emfa | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 2 | 9 Oct 2001 22:48 |